Cooltown Studios
The official blog for crowdsourced placemaking

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Hilo, HI: First crowdsourced placemaking municipality

Crowdsourced placemaking had been a private sector sponsored success in Bristol, CT, but what about coming from the public sector?

To many, public sector sponsored crowdsourced placemaking sounded rather impossible, with such arguments as:

- A municipality doesn’t do placemaking, or implementation, the private sector does. It’s the actual physical implementation of building real places that sets crowdsourced placemaking apart from just crowdsourcing.
- The city government is obligated to listen to everyone, which means the ‘good’ will be countered with the ‘bad’ and the status quo will result..
- There’s just too much bureaucracy in government for them to sign off on something like crowdsourcing.

Well, the City of Hilo, Hawaii, with a population of around 50,000, launched a formal crowdsourced placemaking program in November, 2011 anyway, at ourdowntownhilo.com. Public support so far has been very positive. Here’s how they addressed the aforementioned concerns:

- Sponsored by the city planning department, the staff understands that it’s the private sector that does the actual placemaking when it comes to buildings, but that the public sector sets the rules when it comes to public places, which are often critical to the success of buildings. In addition, ideas that reach a certain level of popularity that are private sector oriented, such as a coffeehouse or a mixed-use building, are then connected to a private sector entity that’s willing to work with the crowd, given the benefit of having a market already assembled for them.
- The City of Hilo already went through an extensive visioning process to create a plan on how to essentially be more triple-bottom-line (economically, socially, environmentally) sustainable and prosperous by 2025. So it wasn’t difficult to require that all ideas be triple bottom line to comply with the plan.
- Why did the City of Hilo actually make the leap ahead of everyone else in what may very well be the standard way we plan and develop places in the future? It takes one person willing to be a pioneer, willing to take a risk, in a position of enough authority to make it happen, and that person was city planner Susan Gagorik.


Posted by Neil Takemoto in • Crowdsourced PlacemakingGovernment Innovation | (0) Comments | Link

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Popularise

‘Popularise’ looks to crowdsource storefront businesses

The sons of a big-time developer in Washington DC learned enough about the real estate industry to the point they feel it’s ‘broken’. So, rather than continue the ‘Big Head’ oriented path of the real estate industry, the chose to forge a new one via the ‘Long Tail’. That is, they’re looking to crowdsource what gets built, starting with ground-floor businesses in Washington DC.

From their website: “Today, neighborhood development is dominated by large institutional companies that use Wall

read more…


Posted by Neil Takemoto in • Crowdsourced Placemaking | (0) Comments | Link |

Monday, November 07, 2011

Locavesting, crowdfunding local businesses on the rise

We’re reaching the tipping point where our investment and tax dollars are going to start benefitting our local economies rather than private investors, with the ‘Long Tail‘ leading the way. Crowdfunding, a natural extension of crowdsourcing, emerges from the Long Tail and is coming to small businesses. It’s about time!

Cities are wising up in prioritize investing in independent businesses districts over chains. According to a BusinessWeek article, subsidies for chains are not effective. Big

read more…


Posted by Neil Takemoto in • Economic GardeningInvestmentRetail Venue Development | (0) Comments | Link |

Monday, October 31, 2011

Big Head vs. Long Tail

‘Big Head’ and ‘Long Tail’ both key to placemaking

As we’re witnessing in communities from the Middle East to Wall Street, people are taking it upon themselves to organize and effect lasting change on behalf of the triple bottom line (being economically, socially and environmentally beneficial). These groups aren’t advocating having swarms of people as a better structure for governance, they’re just tired of what’s known in business as the ‘Big Head‘ (represented by the red in the graph above) having too much control, such as in

read more…


Posted by Neil Takemoto in • Cool DevelopersCrowdsourced Placemaking | (0) Comments | Link |

Friday, October 14, 2011

The crowdsourced placemaking grant list

Demand sparks supply, so let’s get a list of cities that want to see crowdsourced placemaking in their city, town and/or neighborhood. Then we’ll look into how we can secure grants for them, whether it’s through a new national/international nonprofit or through a local nonprofit. See this NY Times story on Bristol, CT,“You ‘Like’ It, They Build It” for an example of results, which should be a compelling story for potential funders for programs initiated by the local community.

What would the

read more…


Posted by Neil Takemoto in • Crowdsourced Placemaking | (0) Comments | Link |

Thursday, September 01, 2011

Clockwise from top left: Granville Street, Vancouver; South Lake Union, Seattle; West 7th, Fort Worth, Texas; Corktown, Detroit

Pop-up placemaking and next gen urban neighborhoods

Trendwatching.com reports that with 180,000 people moving into cities daily, a rising creative urban population they refer to as Citysumers are defining a new generation that’s more demanding, open-minded, connected, spontaneous and more try-out-prone than ever. What that means is if there ever was a time to experiment with forward-thinking placemaking, the time is now.

The current manifestation of that mentality is with ‘pop-up’ placemaking. It allow cities to try out innovative placemaking

read more…


Posted by Neil Takemoto in • Market Development | (0) Comments | Link |

Friday, August 05, 2011

Proposed central plaza next to a market square (seen in distance) for the Village of Hempstead, New York

Revitalizing a struggling downtown: Crowdsource it… or not

With the Village of Hempstead, Long Island, New York, when a development team implemented crowdsourcing into the development process in 2011, the Village approved it unanimously. Not so when it wasn’t part of the process in 2007, which resulted in rejection.

In 2007, a development company presented the Village of Hempstead residents (pop. 53K), struggling economically at a medium income half of the immediate area, with 5200 construction jobs, 1200 permanent jobs and $35 million a year in new

read more…


Posted by Neil Takemoto in • Crowdsourced Placemaking | (0) Comments | Link |

Friday, July 29, 2011

Del Mar Station development, Pasadena, California

What is triple-bottom-line real estate development?

Many of us know that the triple bottom line means “people, planet and profit”, being economically, socially and environmentally beneficial. That is, expanding the traditional reporting framework to take into account ecological and social performance in addition to financial performance (Wikipedia).

So what does this mean for real estate development? What would triple bottom line real estate development look like? Keep in mind this is about the real estate development industry, not about the

read more…


Posted by Neil Takemoto in • Investment | (0) Comments | Link |

Thursday, July 14, 2011

New “Crowdsourcing for Idiots” book features town

There’s a plethora of books on crowdsourcing out there, but only one documents the crowdsourcing of a city’s entire downtown. In other words, it shows you how far crowdsourcing has come along, from T-shirts to now cities.

Below is the full excerpt from the book, The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Crowdsourcing by Aliza Sherman, published July 2011 (sure, we had something to do with it). Two days after the book was released, the NY Times published an article on the crowdsourced placemaking of the

read more…


Posted by Neil Takemoto in • Crowdsourced PlacemakingMedia & Resources | (2) Comments | Link |

Thursday, June 30, 2011

‘Creating nature’ with an urban village in Seattle

This is apparently Seattle’s first transit-oriented development (TOD). If it gets better than this with TODs so come, hold on to your seats, you’re in for a fun ride.

The starting point is a 9-acre parking lot (left of photo), pretty much your standard building block in many U.S. cities, though adjacent to a major bus transfer station with planned light rail access, which means walkable urban village development is a natural next step. However, one half of what makes this a model for the rest

read more…


Posted by Neil Takemoto in • Cool DevelopersMixed-Use Developments | (2) Comments | Link |

Monday, June 13, 2011

The Global Village plaza at the Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York

Universities finally building urban villages… on campus

Most students at university campuses either don’t need to drive, don’t need to own cars. Yet the isolated dormitory, classroom and cafeteria zone form of development, similar to the isolated subdivision, office park and shopping mall model of suburban development, surprisingly hasn’t changed for decades. Until now. Finally.

Thanks to the forward thinkers at the Rochester Institute of Technology in Rochester, New York, they not only invested $54 million into an open-to-the-public mixed-use

read more…


Posted by Neil Takemoto in • University Towns | (0) Comments | Link |
Page 1 of 167 pages  1 2 3 >  Last »