Cooltown Studios
The official blog for crowdsourced placemaking

Monday, February 06, 2012

Rightsizing, not downsizing, is what the next gen is about

While ‘one size fits all’ may have been the mass production model of the industrial revolution, it’s encouraging to know that the model driving the creative, information, knowledge economy of the present is based on providing what people truly want. That ‘right size’ we’re looking for is finally being provided as an option.

Rightsizing Living
Regular readers know this has been well covered in this blog, that the next gen wants smaller homes, that the housing crisis needed a correction as housing sizes got out of control. Single-family home sizes are dropping for the first time. According to a 2011 report, What’s Next? Real Estate in the New Economy, by a leading real estate organization, the Urban Land Institute (ULI), Gen Y (in their teens and early thirties) prefers smaller homes in favor of an easier commute and better lifestyle. Perhaps this will lead to ‘people rightsizing’ in a country where two-thirds of the population is overweight.

Rightsizing Commuting
As stated above, people are rightsizing their commute, looking to live closer to work and creating new, less expensive options for getting there. As stated in a new study by Zipcar, more Gen Yers are selling their cars or never buying one in the first place, opting for car sharing when they absolutely need one. The same is true even for bicycles with the rise of bike sharing.

Rightsizing Working
Many major companies will decentralize and value smaller office locations in 24-hour urban centers to enable innovation by being closer to where the creative, next gen populations are migrating to. For example, Google has invested in one of the largest buildings in downtown Manhattan, a beaux arts building in central Paris, a warehouse in downtown Pittsburgh, and a new building in downtown Boulder, Colorado… a far cry from the office parks of the 20th century. The aforementioned ULI report also states that office tenants will decrease space per employee, transforming into meeting places more than work places, with an emphasis on open configurations that foster interaction.

In a March 17, 2011 news article, “Zappos CEO envisions a new community downtown“, Zappos CEO Tony Hsieh shows he’s fully invested in rightsizing to benefit his employees, “Hsieh is exploring building 500 to 1,000 units of 100-square-foot spaces rented for $100 a month - enough room for a bed and a closet, while bathroom facilities would be shared. Maybe a bar or lounge would be attached to the building and renters would crash there whenever they wanted. “Maybe call it the Crash Pad,” he said. Renters would be screened to keep it from becoming a homeless or hooker option, he said.“

Rightsizing towns?
While you may be thinking that rightsizing is only relevant to urban areas and big cities, it isn’t. Even small towns are rightsizing their footprints as we evolve from sprawl to what are being referred to as ‘micropolitans’; small towns with compact downtowns. This is especially important given that 51% of Americans indicated that they would prefer to live in either a small town (30%) or rural area (21%). For a more detailed and contemporary definition of ‘micropolitan’, check out the Micropolitan Manifesto, a primer for author Katie McCaskey’s upcoming book, Urban Escapee: “Micropolitan: a place anchored with a human-scaled, walkable downtown in the smallest cities possible, that each have the potential to be simultaneously “micro” and “cosmopolitan”’.

So, what’s next? Now’s it’s time to decide what rightsizing means to you in your community, and if you’re committed to doing something about it, it’s on to organizing a group of like-minded people to crowdsource that vision into reality. That’s the purpose behind this site.


Posted by Neil Takemoto in • Market Development | (0) Comments | Link
  • Enjoy this post? Share it with others.
  • Digg Favicon
  • Email Favicon
  • Facebook Favicon
  • LinkedIn Favicon
  • StumbleUpon Favicon
  • TwitThis Favicon

Friday, September 26, 2003

Waterfront, Gemany

Phase II:  Building the Physical Community

Continuing this week’s focus on the CoolTown Program...

Phase II:  Building the Physical Community

Successful talent attraction comes down to providing three key elements:  Entertainment, jobs and affordability, in that order.  Fulfilling just one, or even two elements won’t make it happen.  All three must be brought together, and that requires building a CoolTown.

Why is entertainment (& arts) first?  Most young professionals won’t take a dream job if it were in a small farm town,

read more…


Posted by Neil Takemoto in • Beta Communities | (0) Comments | Link |

Thursday, September 25, 2003

Young people and cool towns

Phase I:  Building the Human Community

Continuing this week’s focus on the CoolTown Program...

OK, we’re committed to becoming a CoolTown.  What are the next steps?

Phase I:  Building the Human Community

The first phase is building the community of people that are not only going to lead the effort of becoming a CoolTown, but who will actually live, work and grow new businesses there.  This CoolTown Market Creation program envisions a five-step process:

1. The CoolTown 100 - We’ll establish a collaborative of the most

read more…


Posted by Neil Takemoto in • Beta Communities | (0) Comments | Link |

Wednesday, September 24, 2003

Do businesses believe in CoolTowns?

Do businesses believe in CoolTowns?

Continuing this week’s focus on the CoolTown Program...

Do businesses believe in CoolTowns?  Absolutely, as long as CoolTowns attract creative talent.  The world’s largest companies understand this: 

“Keep your tax incentives and highway interchanges, we will go where the highly-skilled people are” - Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina in a presentation to the National Governors Association in 2002.  It shouldn’t be a coincidence that HP’s slogan is “Invent”, nor that HP has a tech-oriented

read more…


Posted by Neil Takemoto in • Economic Gardening | (0) Comments | Link |

Tuesday, September 23, 2003

Need Talent?

Got Talent?

Continuing this week’s focus on the CoolTown Program...

Why isn’t my city attracting growth, excitement and prosperity like Austin?

Does your city produce and retain talent?  Major universities produce talent.  A creative city retains it.  The tipping point to prosperity occurs when the two combine to form a formidable one-two punch:

1. Talent-Producing Universities
The SF Bay Area has Stanford; Cambridge has Harvard and MI; Austin has the 49,000 student University of Texas and

read more…


Posted by Neil Takemoto in • Economic Gardening | (0) Comments | Link |

Monday, September 22, 2003

CoolTown program

The CoolTown Program

A great vision doesn’t really matter if it can’t be implemented.  Implementation doesn’t mean much if it no one cared for the vision.

The key to the CoolTown Program is to combine a great vision with the financial capacity to implement it.  That means letting the people who will live/work in the community design it, and finding investors who will finance it.

The program summary, which is downloadable, begins:

“The San Francisco Bay Area, Denver and Charlotte made attracting young

read more…


Posted by Neil Takemoto in • Beta CommunitiesInvestment | (1) Comments | Link |

Friday, September 19, 2003

Piazza del Campo, Siena, Italy

Investing in ‘people places’ over parking

So what does it take to build a place where people quickly realize that vibrant pedestrian life is more appealing and healthier than streets filled with moving vehicles, or a sterile parking lot?

1a. You need a progressive government that’s willing to enable legislation to eliminate minimum parking requirements.  If the people don’t want all that parking, the government shouldn’t require themselves to spend money to supply it.

1b. You also need, at the same time, a progressive private sector

read more…


Posted by Neil Takemoto in • InvestmentInvisible Technology | (0) Comments | Link |

Thursday, September 18, 2003

Uptown District, San Diego, CA

A people village in San Diego

Yesterday’s blog diagrammed the concept of hiding cars on a neighborhood scale.  Today we show you a real such neighborhood.

Uptown District is a relatively new urban village in San Diego that creates a pedestrian-oriented destination and economic model for success, aided by its progressive parking layout.

1. The parking in the retail area of Uptown (right of photo) is located mid-block - that is, all the parking is behind buildings.  The only building facing a parking lot is a Ralph’s

read more…


Posted by Neil Takemoto in • Invisible Technology | (0) Comments | Link |

Wednesday, September 17, 2003

Dover Kohl parking

Hiding a lot more than 17 cars

Yesterday’s blog demonstrated how to hide 17 cars.  But what about 500 cars?

Town planners Dover Kohl illustrate how to do this, which is a textbook method of parking in the New Urbanism movement:

1. Parking is placed behind all the buildings, forming a parking core in the middle of the blocks.  Thus, pedestrians only see people-filled streetscapes and streetfronts (ideally a paseo with no cars at all), not a parking lot/garage.

2. The entire site is built upon an underground parking

read more…


Posted by Neil Takemoto in • Invisible Technology | (0) Comments | Link |

Tuesday, September 16, 2003

Shattuck Lofts, Berkeley, California, CA

Find the parking for 24 tenants

Can you find the parking for the 24 tenants who live here?  Hint: It’s not behind, to the side or in front of the building.

1. First of all, not everyone who bought a home here at the Shattuck Avenue Lofts needed, or wanted a parking space.  The first downtown housing in Berkeley in fifty years, only 17 parking spaces needed to be provided.

2. Secondly, the 17 parking spaces take up the same space as 9 parking spaces, as illustrated in yesterday’s blog.

Answer:  All the parking for the 24

read more…


Posted by Neil Takemoto in • Invisible Technology | (0) Comments | Link |

Monday, September 15, 2003

Klaus Car Parking Systems automated parking garage

Making cars disappear

In business terms, cars are a pure expense.  They’re also expensive for a city: The Minneapolis-St. Paul Star Tribune published an article on Sept. 7 stating that only 24% of its roads are paid for by the people who directly use them.  Cars also take up a lot of space while often adding negative value to the area they’re parked in.

Now, while the coolest (and as a result the most desirable, and thus most expensive) towns are walkable to the point of not needing a car (ie Manhattan), these

read more…


Posted by Neil Takemoto in • Invisible Technology | (1) Comments | Link |
Page 155 of 167 pages « First  <  153 154 155 156 157 >  Last »