30-55%.  That’s the projected demand by 2010 for denser, more walkable neighborhoods (compact cities) according to a USC study.

The summary, funded by the Fannie Mae Foundation, is highlighted and illustrated in a brochure by the Congress for the New Urbanism.

In a nutshell, it takes a 17% overall home buyer preference for these types of communities (which is the same suburban-biased survey revealed in yesterday’s blog), along with a 30% vote of support for townhouses in general, and

read more…

Here’s another reason why new communities are often so undesirable: opportunistic surveys by the nation’s home building association, which in turn guides what is built in the future.  Their 1999 survey concludes that only 9% of 25-34 year olds want to buy a townhouse in a neighborhood like the one on the left (Glenwood Park, Atlanta GA), whereas 91% prefer a single-family home in suburbia with a longer commute to work.

Hello?

Maybe it’s because they chose to survey a specific audience where

read more…

Wouldn’t it be great to live above your own business, just like each of the people who own ‘live-above’ units as in the image, located in Kentlands, Gaithersburg MD?

Got $400,000?

Maybe that’s why the live-above type of live-work unit just isn’t in most of our fields of future vision, and perhaps why urban loft live-work units are.

It doesn’t have to be that way though, not unless you’re one of the early buyers (or better yet, a beta resident)*, can live without luxury features, and

read more…

Last week the blog illustrated the virtues of the Not So Big House.  Yesterday the blog profiled the picturesque town of Niagara-on-the-Lake.  Today, a combination of the two.

The most immediate and noticeable value of these homes is that they’re within walking distance of the town center.  They just wouldn’t seem half as charming otherwise.  On the other hand, if they were all twice as big on much larger lots, there’d be half as many people walking and half of these specific neighborhood

read more…

OK, so the images are a bit Martha Stewartish, but one of the key principles of The Not So Big House is to make the place your own.  As the author states, a well-designed personalized home can have more truly livable space than a home twice its size.

Just at its more interesting to walk into a restaurant with the ducts and pipes exposed under a tall ceiling compared to a low, flat, plaster hung ceiling with fluorescent lighting, a home that shows what makes it ‘tick’ is that much more

read more…

Now here’s an example that takes full advantage of Not So Big living, courtesy of the Tag Front architecture firm.

Work at home?  Live at work?  Would you believe this loft is so space-efficient that it’s nestled right in the middle of the firm’s architecture office?  Brings new meaning to the words ‘commute’ and ‘late night at the office’.  It’s really most appealing if the architecture office is already in a cool neighborhood.

Kitchen or dining room?  Since we really only need one of these

read more…

By the way, in reference to yesterday’s blog, here’s Sarah’s link to the not so big house as applied to communities.

While the examples in The Not So Big House (NSBH) are generally single-family homes in the countryside, the not so big design principles are ideal for CoolTowns:

Open floor plan  As in the rooms not being ‘compartmentalized’.  The kitchen blends into the dining area, blending into the living room.  At parties, people gravitate to the kitchen anyway - it’s the hearth of the

read more…

A few years ago while running the National Town Builders Association (NTBA), I hosted a round table with Sarah Susanka, author of The Not So Big House.  Her book was just starting to gain notoriety (it was #1 on Amazon at one point), and I felt she should meet members of the NTBA whose mission as a trade organization was (and still is) building entire communities of not so big homes.

A few months later, the sequel to her best-seller, Creating the Not So Big House, featured the very members

read more…

With all the buzz about how creativity is vitalizing economies, it’s imperative to understand what motivates the creative people at the heart of it all, like Dana Ellyn, one of Washington DC’s rising artists…

“Living in the suburbs is not an option for me as an artist for many reasons. My art is often inspired by what’s going on around me and events in the news. It is tremendously important for me to feel a part of what’s happening.

read more…

It’s partially a combination of the experience economy (below) and the Not So Big House movements.

People are realizing that there’s more to ‘experience’ than what’s in the confines on one’s home and TV set, and that involves rich, interesting and diverse layers of life and activity in the immediate neighborhood.  Maybe that explains the popularity of reality TV?  Anyway, that intensity of life can’t exist without a critical mass of concentrated residences, and a loft is one of the most space

read more…